RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Bakhshish Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J.(Oral) - Petitioner has filed the present revision against the order dated 18.4.2018 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) Tarn Taran, vide which the application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the plaint was dismissed.
2. Perusal of the record would show that the application filed by the plaintiff/petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC was allowed by the trial Court on 2.8.2018. The said order has not been assailed by the defendant in any manner. The necessary amendment arising out of acceptance of application under Order I Rule 10 CPC vis-a-vis the person who has been allowed to be impleaded is sought to be made under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Since the application has been allowed on 2.8.2018, the only surviving prayer is in respect of claim No. A in the head note, which is sought to be amended by mentioning total land and khasra number in the suit.
3. It is a settled principle of law that all bonafide amendments are to be allowed. An amendment in the pleadings is to be liberally construed so as to consider real controversy between the parties and to give the verdict more satisfactorily. The proviso to the Rule to some extent curtails abso
Supreme Court Baldev Singh vs. Manohar Singh
Mashyak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit vs. Usman Habib Dhuka
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal vs. K.K. Modi
Ramchandra Sakharam Mahajan vs. Damodar Trimbak Tanksale Dead
Revajeetu Builders and Developers vs. Narayanaswami and sons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.