JUDGMENT :

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J.

1. The instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment of conviction dated 07.11.2003 and order of sentence dated 12.11.2003 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sonipat vide which the accused/appellant was convicted under Sections 429 and 435 IPC and sentenced as under:-

Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 11.02.2001 at about 9:40 P.M. complainant Zile Singh (PW4) made a statement Ex.PB to the effect that the appellant/ accused Parveen had been causing harassment to the complainant party as he wanted to construct a passage after breaking a wall towards their side of the house. A compromise had been effected between the parties repeatedly with the intervention of the village respectables. As per the complainant, on the intervening night