SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.DULAT, SHAMSHER BAHADUR
Brij Mohan Sabni – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : F.C. Bediand I.M. Oberai, adv
For the Respondent: Hardyal Hardy and H.S. Dhir, adv

JUDGMENT :

1. Two motor cycles, one driven by Mohinder Kumar Bagai (hereinafter called the Plaintiff) and the other by Brij Mohan Sawhney (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant) collided on 26th February, 1950, at about 6.30 P.M. near the circus around Gol Dak Khana and in a suit for recovery of damages to the tune of Rs. 10,000/- instituted by the Plaintiff, the trial Judge finding that the accident was due to the negligence of the Defendant Las awarded a decree for Rs. 5,686/6/- in favour of the claimant. From this judgment and decree the Defendant has filed an appeal which is R.F.A. No. 10-D of 1955 while the Plaintiff-Respondent has preferred cross-objections for raising the decrial amount by another Rs. 2,000/-. This judgment will dispose of both the appeal and the cross-objections. It may be added that the plaint was amended to include the National Fire and General Insurance Company Ltd., as Defendant No. 2. The decree was awarded against both Brij Mohan Sawhney and the Defendant-company and the appeal has been argued by Mr. F.C. Bedi for both the Appellants.

2. Though the essential facts immediately preceding the impact are disputed, it is agreed between the parties that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top