SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.S.SODHI
Om Parkash Sekhri – Appellant
Versus
Pritam Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.R. Mittal.
For the Respondents: V.P. Gandhi, M.L. Sarin.

JUDGMENT :

S.S. SODHI, J.

1. On February 26, 1972 truck No. PNP 2763, loaded with iron pipes, was travelling from Patiala to Gurdaspur. When it reached near village Jiwan Wal a tyre thereof burst, as a result of which it swerved and hit into another truck, coming from the opposite direction. Om Parkash Sekhri, who was travelling in this truck, at that time, sustained injuries in this accident. It is in respect of these injuries that he sought compensation. This claim was however, negatived by the Tribunal, holding that the accident had not been caused by any negligence on the part of the truck driver. It is this finding which has now been assailed in appeal.

2. It is the common case of the parties that the accident took place due to the tyre burst of the truck and it was on account thereof that it had hit into a truck coming from the opposite direction.

3. The case of the claimant was that the tyres of the truck were old and worn out and it was on this account that the tyre had bursr and further that the truck had been travelling at a fast speed when the tyre burst. The main contesting Respondent here are Sadhu Ram and Dalip Singh Respondents 5 and 6 who according to the evidence on re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top