SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
A. V. Unnikrishanan – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY, J.

1. This order will dispose of F.A.F.O. No. 522 of 1985 filed by the State of Punjab and Cross-Objection No. 88-CII of 1985 filed by A.V. Unnikrishanan, claimant, as these arise out of one and the same judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar.

2. For the purpose of order, facts have been taken from F.A.F.O. No. 522 of 1985.

3. Briefly put, the relevant facts for the decision of the case are that A.V. Unnikrishanan, who was 27 years at the time of accident which took place on 9.9.1982, filed claim application before Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar, claiming Rs. 3,00,000/- as general damages. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of bus No. PBQ 4517 driven by Satwant Singh and awarded compensation in the following manner:

Compensation for permanent disability on account of loss of future earnings

Rs. 1,92,000/-

Compensation for loss of amenities of life

Rs. 25,000/-

Compensation for the change of artificial limbs

Rs. 23,600/-

Compens

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top