SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Sushil Kajal – Appellant
Versus
Jal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ashit Malik.

JUDGMENT :

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY, J.

1. A claim petition before Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra, was filed by Kavita Kajal and Sushil Kajal, claiming to be grandchildren of Beero Devi who had died on 8.1.1986.

2. The case of the appellants was that on 8.1.1986, Beero Devi boarded bus No. HRL 9659 from her village and while she was getting down the bus at village Mathana, the bus conductor had blown whistle whereupon the driver immediately started the bus as a result whereof Beero Devi received a jerk, fell down and was crushed under the wheels of the said bus. The claim petition was restricted under no fault liability only.

3. On the pleadings of the parties, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal framed the following issues:

(1) Whether Beero Devi died in an accident caused due to rash, negligent and careless driving of Haryana Roadways bus No. HRL 965? driven by respondent No. 1?

(2) If issue No. 1 is proved, whether the claimants are entitled to any compensation? If so, its quantum and against whom?

(3) Relief.

4. The Tribunal returned a finding that Beero Devi had died while alighting from bus No. HRL 9659 and under issue No. 2 it was held that claimants were not legal represent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top