RITU BAHRI
Urmila Garg – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ritu Bahri, J. - This order shall dispose of the above two petitions as common question of facts are involved in the above petitions wherein petitioners are seeking quashing of letter dated 09.04.2010 (P-5) and order dated 12.12.2012/02.05.2015 with further prayer for issuance of direction to the respondents to grant/restore one increment equal to 3% of the pay in the pay band. However, for facility of reference the facts are being taken from CWP No. 21241-2013.
2. Petitioner was initially appointed as Research Assistant on work charge basis w.e.f 31.03.1979 and her services were regularized on the said post w.e.f 01.01.1987. Thereafter, vide order dated 28.01.2009 (P-l), the pay of the petitioner was fixed in revised pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with 1 st ACP Grade of Rs.3300/- w.e.f 01.01.2006 and further fixed in the 2 nd ACP pay grade of Rs.3600/- w.e.f 01.01.2007. The petitioner was then promoted as Assistant Director in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.5400/- w.e.f 01.02.2009, vide order dated 10.03.2009(P-2) . Vide order dated 23.04.2009 (P-3), the pay of the petitioner was re-fixed in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.5400/- w.e.f 01.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.