SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 728

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Vijay Kumar Ghai – Appellant
Versus
Pritpal Singh Babbar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. M. S. Rana, Advocate for the respondent

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral) - Prayer in this petition is for setting aside the orders dated 27.10.2016 (Annexure P-7) and 21.11.2016 (Annexure P-10), passed by the trial Court in Complaint No. 8341/2013 dated 21.03.2012 titled as Pritpal Singh Babbar vs. Vijay Kumar Ghai, vide which an application filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was dismissed and the prayer of the petitioner to produce on record the income tax returns of the complainant/respondent was declined.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent/complainant has filed a complaint under Section 138 of the N. I. Act against the petitioner on account of dishonouring of a cheque of Rs. 11 Lakh, which was allegedly given by the petitioner for repaying the said loan.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the allegations in the complaint, the complainant has stated that he had advanced a loan of Rs. 11 Lakh to the petitioner/accused on 05.03.2008 byway of a demand draft and the petitioner was paying the interest of Rs. 8,250/- per month to clear the loan amount by February, 2012. It is further stated in the complaint that the petitioner was regularly paying the qua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top