ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. (Oral) - The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.126 dated 01.06.2018 registered under Sections 120-B, 148, 149, 201, 285, 302, 364, 365 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, Fatehabad.
2. Reply by way of affidavit of Sh. Subhash Chander, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, City, Fatehabad has been filed in the Court today which is taken on record.
3. After arguing for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to continue with the present petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
5. Before parting with this case, it may be observed that the petitioner is in custody since 18.06.2018. As per the information given by learned State Counsel only one prosecution witness out of 44 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far. In view of the observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Doongar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan 2018 (1) RCR Criminal 256 , State of U.P. vs. Shambhu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.