SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 866

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Subhash Chander Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Alias Babli – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. - CRM-19752-2014

2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 634 days in filing the application seeking leave to appeal.

3. It is mentioned in the application that the complaint filed by the applicant-complainant was dismissed on 09.08.2012 and thereafter, the applicant had filed an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, well within the period of limitation, but the said appeal had been dismissed vide order dated 02.06.2014, being not maintainable. The delay had occurred due to filing of the appeal before the wrong forum.

4. Keeping in view the fact that the applicant had been wrongly pursuing the appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, the present application is allowed and the delay of 634 days in filing the application seeking leave to appeal, is condoned.

CRM-A-1030-MA-2014

5. Special leave to appeal has been sought against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bahadurgarh, while dismissing the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, 'N.I.Act').

6. Proceedings were initiated on account of dishonour of c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top