Nasim vs State Of Haryana - 2020 Supreme(P&H) 932

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(P&H) 932

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Nasim – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepanshu Mehta, Advocate for appellants in CRA-S-3930-SB-2017 and CRA-S-4198-SB-2017; Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bawa, Advocate for Appellant/appellant in CRR-213-2018 and CRA-AD-346-2019.Mr. G.S.Wasu, Addl. AG, Haryana

JUDGMENT

Harinder Singh Sidhu, J. - This order shall dispose of the afore mentioned four cases.

2. Criminal Appeal No.S-3930-SB of 2017 (filed by Nasim) and Criminal Appeal No.S-4198-SB of 2017 (filed by Saddiq and Javed) have been filed by the appellants against their conviction and sentence vide judgment and order dated 26/28.10.2017 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mewat at Nuh in Sessions case No.756 of 2016 whereby they were charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') along with Shakeel, Nayyer and Jahul. The appellants were convicted and sentenced as under:-

Name of Convict-Appellant	Under Sections	Sentence	In default of fine
Nasim	307 IPC	RI for 07 years and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-	To undergo SI for 06 months
	323 IPC	R1 for 06 months
Javed	325 IPC	R1 for 01 year and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-	To undergo SI for 01 month
	323	R1 for 06 months

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(P&H) 932

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHUNasim – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Nasim – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent