RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Sarjeewan Rani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. For the reasons recorded hereafter, the Registry is directed not to list any fresh RSA for hearing, the subject matter of which is a service law dispute, with effect from 16.3.2020 without the filing counsel: (1) placing on record [at the appropriate place] a brief synopsis of the case with the list of major dates and events; (2) the applicable rules of service; (3) the specific rule/s involved [with photocopy, if in the opinion of the counsel it is fundamental to the understanding of the issue/s in motion hearing [not regular hearing]; (4) attaching a copy of the impugned order/s, with the English translation, if the original is in the vernacular; (5) copies of the basic documents they would refer to [copies of the original with translations]; (6) the law point/s involved for determination; (7) citation of the judgments relied upon, if not the texts, if any, etc. [or at least keep in hand the anticipated documents, adverse orders, precedents handy for production in court at the first hearing in katcha peshi, other than (1) to (4) above, [the rest being optional in the opinion of the counsel if it promotes the case in appeal to be kept ready to be handed over in Court, i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.