SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1144

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Vipin @ Mannu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Gupta, Advocate, Saurabh Mohunta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. - Matter has been taken up through video conferencing via Webex facility in the light of the Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

2. Petitioner seeks benefit of regular bail in case FIR No.0693 dated 19.11.2018 registered under sections 307, 216, 120-B, 34 I.P.C and section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station, Civil Lines, District Hisar.

3. Counsel for the parties have been heard.

4. FIR came to be registered on the statement of Sachin in relation to an alleged occurrence that took place on 19.11.2018 at about 8 a.m. Precise allegations are that certain unnamed boys came on a motorcycle and started firing from the pistols held by them and fire arm shots were suffered by maternal uncle of the complainant i.e. two bullet on left hand and one bullet on the right hand.

5. Present petitioner was arrested on 15.10.2019.

6. Investigation in the case is complete and the challan already stands presented.

7. Learned State counsel has informed the Court that out of 37 prosecution witnesses only one has been examined till date.

8. Trial as such would take time to conclude and particularly in the light of the current COVID-19 pandemic.

9. Learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top