SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1255

ARUN MONGA
Malkeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.S. Sodhi, Advocate; for the petitioner.; Ms. Tanisha Peshawarai, DAG Haryana.; Mr. C.P. Tiwana, Advocate; For the complainant.

JUDGMENT

Arun Monga, J. - After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks to withdraw the instant pre-arrest bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.

3. However, before parting, this Court would like to observe that though genuineness and real genesis of the allegations contained in the FIR in question would be established only in the course of investigation, but the factual narrative therein, visa-vis the ordeal suffered by the complainant, is a sordid tale on how unscrupulous immigration agents deceive gullible Indians who are aspirants of overseas jobs. A bare reading of FIR is no less chilling and shuddering than a Goosebumps giving, potboiler Hollywood thriller action movie plot.

4. Per FIR, complainant states that the accused promised to send him directly to United States of America on payment of Rs.20 lacs. Of which, 50% i.e. Rs.10 lacs was paid in India. Balance was to be paid on his successful arrival in USA. Americas, the complainant did reach, but South America, instead of United States. Complainant was first made to board a hopping flight from Delhi to Sao Paulo in Brazil. From Sao Pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top