SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1300

H.S.MADAAN
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Jagjit Singh (naya) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Jagram Singh Cooner, Advocate for the appellant.

JUDGMENT

H.S. Madaan, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 26.8.2008 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala City vide which he had dismissed complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by complainant Manohar Lal against accused Jagjit Singh.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that complainant Manohar Lal had brought the complaint in question against accused Jagjit Singh on the allegations that on 9.10.2003 at instance of accused, who was acquainted with him earlier, he had advanced a loan of Rs.40,000/- to him. At that time the accused had promised to return the loan amount within a period of two months and in pursuance to fulfil his promise and to discharge his part of liability in the month of December 2003 he had issued a cheque bearing No. 571361 dated 22.12.2003 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce in the sum of Rs.30,000/-promising that on presentation the cheque would be encashed and that he would pay the remaining amount of Rs. 10,000/- within one month. However, when the complainant presented the cheque for encashment to his banker on 2.1.2004 the said cheque was dishonoured due to insufficiency of the amount. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top