IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Raj Mohan Singh, J.
Kulwinder Singh @ Bhinda - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No. 10316 of 2020
Decided On : 12-11-2020
NDPS Act - Bail - Sections 22-B, 61 - Summary: The court dismissed the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C in a case registered under Sections 22-B, 61 of NDPS Act. The court discussed the competence of the Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda to act as a Gazetted Officer under the NDPS Act, referring to relevant notifications and orders. The court concluded that the Vice Principal was authorized to act as a Gazetted Officer, and therefore, the bail application was dismissed.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in a case registered under Sections 22-B, 61 of NDPS Act. The contraband was recovered in the presence of the Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda, and the competence of the Vice Principal to act as a Gazetted Officer was challenged.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda was authorized to act as a Gazetted Officer under the NDPS Act, based on relevant notifications and orders. The bail application was dismissed as it was found to be devoid of merits.
Issues: Competence of the Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda to act as a Gazetted Officer under the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court analyzed relevant notifications and orders to determine the competence of the Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda to act as a Gazetted Officer under the NDPS Act. It concluded that the Vice Principal was authorized to act as a Gazetted Officer.
Final Decision: The bail application was dismissed as it was found to be devoid of merits.
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.294 dated 28.11.2019 registered under Sections 22-B, 61 of NDPS Act at Police Station Kalanwali, District Sirsa.
2. Fir was registered on the basis of suspicion when the police apprehended the petitioner. A notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act was issued to the petitioner and the petitioner opted for his search before the Gazetted Officer. Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda was called and in his presence, search was effected. 600 tablets of Tramadol mentioning as Tramadol Hydrochloride tablets 100 mg on every leaf were recovered from the plastic bag hanging on the handle of the motorcyclewith batch number and date of manufacturing.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda is not competent to act as a Gazetted Officer under NDPS Act. Learned counsel referred to notification dated 29.12.1986 issued by the Department of Excise and Taxation, Haryana, whereby officers of and above the rank of Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer in Excise and Taxation Department, of or above the rank of Tehsildars in the Revenue Department and of and above the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police in Police Department were empowered to act as Gazetted Officers. Therefore, Vice Principal, Government ITI, Odda cannot be termed to be an empowered Gazetted Officer to undertake the assignment of Gazetted Officer.
4. Learned State counsel referred to memo No.20341-88/CR3 dated 30.08.2019 issued by the Director General of Police, Crime, Panchkula to all the Commissioners of Police, Deputy Commissioners and other authorities along with list of empowered Gazetted Officers other than private officers. The said memo was issued as per direction(s) issued by the High Court on 28.05.2019 in CRM-M No.5074 of 2019 titled Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others. As per list attached with the said memo, name of Raj Kumar, Vice Principal, Government, ITI, Odda finds mention at serial No.8 of the list.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to order dated 28.05.2019 passed in CRM-M No.5074 of 2019 titled Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others submitted that the direction was to prepare the list of empowered Gazetted Officers other than the Police Officers along with mobile phones in consultation with the Deputy Commissioner of concerned District and the same was to be prepared in PDF format and was to be given to the Investigating Officer so as to call a Gazetted Officer during the course of investigation. The empowered Gazetted Officers should be in the context of notification dated 29.12.1986.
6. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that firstly the recovered contraband falls under commercial category. Vide notification dated 05/08.04.1996 issued by the Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana, Revenue Department, Naib Tehsildars of the Revenue Department were granted status of Class-II Gazetted Officers on their regular appointments after completion of prescribed departmental examination. An amendment was carried out vide Act No.9 of 2001 in Section 42 of the NDPS Act.
7. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M No.15538 of 2020 titled Tejpal @ Teju Vs. State of Haryana decided the issue on 03.11.2020. Operative part of the order reads as under:-
".........Keeping in view the contentions raised, the State Government was called upon to explain as to how the Gazetted Officer from the Department of Panchayats was empowered. Pursuant thereto attention of this court has drawn to the order issued by Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa dated 17.09.2019 giving a list of Gazetted Officers who have been empowered/authorized in this regard. The aforesaid order was issued by the Deputy Commissioner pursuant to request made by Superintendent of Police, Sirsa on 12.09.2019. There is a reason behind writing such letter and issua
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.