SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1495

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Arshad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Virendra Rana, Advocate, Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J. - The case was taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.396 dated 14.05.2019, registered under Sections 148/149/323/364/285/452 IPC and Sections 25- 54-59 of the Arms Act (Section 302 IPC added later on) at Police Station Nuh, District Mewat.

3. The FIR was registered on the statement of Saikul with the allegations that in the night of occurrence at about 12/12.30 A.M., the complainant and others head cries of his brother Sakir and his wife Yasmin. The complainant, his wife, his father and his mother woke up and came out of the house and saw that 10- 12 persons were standing and pulling Sakir forcibly. Those persons were Sapat, Junaid sons of Kallu, Deenu, Bashir and Rashid along with 5-6 unknown persons. When the complainant tried to rescue his brother, then Junaid gave a blow on left side of his neck with a pointed weapon. He gave second blow in the abdomen of the complainant from reverse side. The assailants also gave injuries to the sister-in-law of the complainant namely Yasmin and they forcibly kidnapped Sakir in a vehicle. The complainant-party chased

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top