JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - The plaintiffs-appellants have filed the present Regular Second Appeal against the judgments passed by both the Courts below dismissing the suit filed by them seeking declaration that they are owners in possession of the suit land.

2. In the considered view of this Court, the question which needs adjudication is "Whether a wrong entry in the revenue record necessarily give rise to a cause of action for the purpose of calculating limitation for filing a civil suit for declaration that the plaintiffs are owners in possession of the land?"

3. Parties are being referred to by their name or original status in the suit.

FACTS:-

Dispute in the present litigation is with regard to mutual exchange of land comprised in two parcels of land. Hence, it would be appropriate to refer both the parcels as Table-A and Table-B. The land comprised in Table-A is as under:-

Khewat No.206/210, Khatoni No.384, 385, 386, Khasra No.62/24/2(1-16), 63/2(8-0), 81/1(8-0), 81/1/2(1-0), 62/25(8-0), 82/1/1(0-7), 2/1(4-19), 2/2(2-9), 3(8-0), 4(8-0), 5 (8-0), 6(7-8), 7(8-0), 8(8-0), 9(8-0), 10(7-2), 12/2(4-4), 13 (8-0), 14(8-0), 15(7-8), 16(8-0), 17(8-0), 18(8-0), 19/1(4-4), 22(8-0), 23