SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1546

RITU BAHRI
Labh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harvinder Singh Maan, Advocate, Sheenu Sura, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ritu Bahri, J. - This petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.196 dated 14.08.2020, under Sections 22- C/27-A of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station, City Ratia, District Fatehabad.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that name of the petitioner came pursuant to a disclosure statement made by Prem Singh that petitioner was the supplier of tablets to the accused.

3. Learned State counsel informs that recovery in this case is 'commercial' in nature. She is not disputing that the name of petitioner was disclosed by a person, from whom, recovery of contraband was effected. On a specific query, she states that no other case under the NDPS Act is pending against the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the decision given in Rajwinder Vs. State of Haryana,2019 1 LawHerald 848 on the proposition that if, a person is named on the disclosure statement of the co-accused and has not been arrested from the spot, then he is entitled to get the concession of anticipatory bail.

5. In the present case, petitioner is in custody since 24.08.2020. Heard.

6. Keeping in view the period of incarcerat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top