SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1612

RAJAN GUPTA, KARAMJIT SINGH
Milkhi Ram Bhagwan Dass – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aalok Jagga, Advocate, D.K. Singal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Karamjit Singh, J. - Case has been heard through video conferencing on account of COVID-19 Pandemic.

2. The petitioner has moved this petition seeking writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to grant six months' time to it to make the remaining payment as per One Time Settlement (OTS) dated 31.05.2019 (Annexure P-2), with further direction to restrain the respondents from taking physical possession of the mortgaged property of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner is a partnership firm and it availed a loan limit of Rs.1.55 crore from respondent No.2-Bank. Later on, the petitioner defaulted in repaying the loan and its loan account was declared as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) by respondent No.2-Bank on 06.10.2018. The proceedings under Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter called 'Act of 2002'), were initiated by respondent No.2-Bank against it, which included notice under Section 13(2) of the Act of 2002. Respondent No.2 also filed an application before the District Magistrate, Mansa-respondent No.1 to take possession of the secured assets. To this effect, notice (Annexure P-1) was issued by responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top