IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Rajan Gupta, Karamjit Singh, JJ.
Om Parkash Parihar And Another - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana And Others - Respondent
CWP No. 25807 of 2016
Decided On : 18-03-2020
Registration Act - Property Registration - Section 17(1) of the Registration Act, 1899 - Section 38A of the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - The court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of the statutory provisions and settled proposition of law.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners filed a Civil Writ Petition seeking direction to register the sale deed of a property they purchased, which was being denied based on guidelines issued by the State Government.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of the statutory provisions and the settled proposition of law.
Issues: The main issue was the denial of registration of the sale deed based on guidelines issued by the State Government.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that circulars and executive guidelines cannot supplement or override statutory provisions, and directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in light of the statutory provisions and settled proposition of law.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of the statutory provisions and the settled proposition of law.
JUDGMENT
Karamjit Singh, J. - The petitioners have filed this Civil Writ Petition for mandamus or direction directing respondent No.3 -Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'HUDA'), respondent No.l-State of Haryana and respondent No.4-Director, Town and Country Planning, Haryana, to register the sale deed of the property in question in the name of the petitioners as required by the provisions of Registration Act.
2. The case of the petitioners is that they purchased flat measuring 166 Sq. Yards from respondent No.2-M/s Ansal Buildwell Ltd., vide agreement for sale-cum-allotment letter dated 06.03.2009. The possession of the flat was obtained by the petitioners from the said respondent on 25.03.2011. The ownership of the flat has not been transferred in the name of the petitioners by respondent No.2 by way of registered deed on the ground that, as per circular (Annexure R-l) dated 27.03.2009 issued by the Special Secretary, Financial Commissioner-cum-Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Town and Country Planning Department, the registration of independent floors can be allowed only regarding the plots measuring 180 Sq. Yards and above.
3. In the written reply, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have contended that the plot of the petitioners being less than 180 Sq. Yards, it's conveyance/sale deed cannot be registered, as per the instructions dated 13.03.2009/27.03.2009 issued by the State Government.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that guidelines dated 13.03.2009/27.03.2009 regarding registration of the independent floors of residential plots having size of 180 Sq. Yards or above, are not statutory in nature. The said guidelines are discriminatory and violative of the provisions of the Registration Act. The said guidelines cannot prevail upon the statutory provisions of law. It is further contended that previously also civil writ petition was filed by the petitioners to direct respondent Nos.l, 3 and 4 to register the deed regarding sale of property in question in favour of the petitioners. In the said writ petition direction was given to the respondents to consider the petitioners' application dated 10.09.2014 for registration of sale deed. Despite the said direction, no action has been taken by the respondents. It is further pleaded that necessary direction be given to the respondents to do the needful so that the sale deed regarding property in question be registered in favour of the petitioners, as per the provisions of the Registration Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners also referred to Suraj Lamp and Industries Pvt. Ltd, through Director Vs. State of Haryana (2012) 1 SCC, 656 , wherein, it was held that immovable property can be legally and lawfully transferred/conveyed only by a registered deed of conveyance.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, on behalf of respondent No.l contended that Government instructions dated 06.03.2009/27.03.2009 clearly bars the registration of independent floors for residential plots of area lesser than 180 Sq. Yards. The property of the petitioners, measuring 166 Sq. Yards situated in Gurugram, is not covered under the aforesaid policy. So, the sale deed regarding property in question cannot be registered in the name of the petitioners. It is contended that the writ petition deserves to be dismissed.
We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties.
6. The earlier writ petition filed by the petitioners was disposed of by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 04.05.2016 by directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' application for registration made vide letter dated 10.09.2014.
7. It is the case of the petitioners that they had purchased floor measuring 166 Sq. Yards from respondent No.2, regarding which, they intend to get registered the sale deed in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.