SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1691

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B.S.Bairagi Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Samina Dhir, DAG, Punjab., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. (Oral). - The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in a case registered against him vide FIR No.99 dated 1.5.2018 under Sections 376/420 IPC and under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 at Police Station City South, Moga, District Moga.

2. The FIR in question was lodged at the instance of prosecutrix wherein she has alleged that she is aged about 17 years and that she was introduced to the petitioner Satnam Singh about 3 years ago, who had started following her. It is alleged that the petitioner was a Dancer and represented that he was willing to marry the prosecutrix and on the basis of the said representation established physical relations with her. It is alleged that the prosecutrix even became pregnant on two occasions and had to get the pregnancy terminated. Subsequently, when her mother came to know about the same, she scolded her and thereafter when Satnam Singh visited her house, he asked her mother to refrain from scolding the prosecutrix and stated that he was willing to solemnize marriage with the prosecutrix. The petitioner is also stated to have held out a representation that he is likely to get a government job on account of the fact that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top