SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 1715

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Rajiv Sharma, Harinder Singh Sidhu , JJ.
Subha Alias Subhashand Others - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
CRA No. D-593-DB-2014(O&M) and CRA No. D-622-DB-2014(O&M)
Decided On : 27-08-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Kanika Ahuja, Advocate, for the Appellants; Ms. Shubhra Singh, Addl. AG, Haryana., Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the Respondent

The existence of common object to commit murder has to be decided in the facts and circumstances of each case, by the nature of weapons used by members of the assembly, the manner and sequence of attack made by those members on the deceased and the circumstances under which the occurrence took place.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SUBJECT - COMBINED KEYWORD - ACT SECTION LIST - SUMMARY

Fact of the Case:

On 29.11.2009, a medical ruqqa and MLR was received in Police Station Kanina that one Harish was admitted in CHC Kanina having sustained injuries in a scuffle. Another injured Rajender had been referred to PGIMS Rohtak without MLR. On this HC Satbir reached CHC Kanina and moved application before the doctor regarding fitness of Harish to make statement. The doctor informed that Harish had been referred to PGIMS Rohtak. But it was learnt that Harish had been admitted in Virendra Hospital, Rewari. HC Satbir reached the hospital and after obtaining opinion regarding fitness of Harish to make statement recorded his statement Ex. PA on 30.11.2009.

Finding of the Court:

The accused/ present appellants were armed with lathis and dandas. As per Ex. PKK the lathi bamboo got recovered by accused Satbir had a length of 5 ft, Its circumference at the top portion was 3 inches. The circumference of the lower portion was 4 inches. As per Ex. PLL the total length of the lathi got recovered by accused Ishwar was 38 inches. The circumference of the front portion was 2 Vi inches. Circumference of the back portion was 3 Vi inches. As per Ex. PMM the length of the lathi bamboo got recovered by accused Pardeep was 50 Vi inches. Circumference of the front portion was 4 inches. Circumference of the back portion was 4 Vi inches.

Issues: Whether the accused had the common object to cause death.

Ratio Decidendi: The accused did not have the common object to cause death. Nor in such a situation could the accused being members of the assembly know that death was likely to be caused in prosecution of the common object of that assembly.

Final Decision: Criminal Appeal No.D-593-DB of 2014 filed by Subha @ Subhash is partly allowed. He is acquitted of the charges under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. But his conviction and sentence under Sections 323, 325, 341 and 427 IPC read with Section 149 are maintained. Criminal Appeal No.D-622-DB-2014 is also partly allowed. Accused Pardeep is acquitted of the offence under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. The conviction of accused Hoshiyar and Satbir is altered from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part I. The conviction and sentence awarded to Pardeep, Hoshiyar and Satbir for the offence under Sections 323, 325, 341 and 427 IPC read with Section 149 are maintained.

JUDGMENT

Harinder Singh Sidhu, J. - Criminal Appeal No.D-593-DB of 2014 has been filed by Subha @ Subhash, while, Criminal Appeal No.D-622-DB-2014 has been filed by Hoshiyar Singh, Pardeep and Satbir. Both the appeals are instituted against the judgment and order dated 11/12.03.2014 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul in Sessions Case No. RT-15 of 2010 whereby the appellants, who were charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 323, 325, 341, 302, 427 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and sentenced as under:-

Offence

Sentence

U/s 323 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for three months;

U/s 325 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one month;

U/s 341 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for one month;

U/s 427 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for one month

U/s 302 IPC

Life Imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, each, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months.

The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Smt.Babli and Deshraj who were tried with the appellants were acquitted.

2. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell is that on 29.11.2009, a medical ruqqa and MLR was received in Police Station Kanina that one Harish was admitted in CHC Kanina having sustained injuries in a scuffle. Another injured Rajender had been referred to PGIMS Rohtak without MLR. On this HC Satbir reached CHC Kanina and moved application before the doctor regarding fitness of Harish to make statement. The doctor informed that Harish had been referred to PGIMS Rohtak. But it was learnt that Harish had been admitted in Virendra Hospital, Rewari. HC Satbir reached the hospital and after obtaining opinion regarding fitness of Harish to make statement recorded his statement Ex. PA on 30.11.2009.

3. Harish stated that he was studying in 10 th class in B.R. Senior Secondary School, Sehlang. He was a member of volley ball team of his school (B.R.Adrash Senior Secondary School, Basai Raod, Sehlang). On 29.11.2009 their team had gone to village Bawal for playing. After taking part in the game they were returning from the school at Bawal to Sehlang in the school bus of their school. The PTI and the Principal Rajinder were accompanying them. At about 6.15 PM the bus reached near the forest of Chellawas. The bus was being driven on its correct side. The driver of an Alto car gave an indication for the bus to stop. When the bus stopped the driver of the Alto car asked the driver of the school bus as to why he had not given side to him. The teachers of the school tried to persuade him not to quarrel. The number of the Alto car was HR26AE/4835 and the driver disclosed his name as Hoshiyar son of Roop Ram. He threatened to teach the driver of the school bus a lesson and started driving his car ahead of the bus. He called his associates on the mobile. Near the railway crossing at Ateli Road, Kanina near the forest he forced the bus to stop by blocking the way. Meanwhile, 6/7 persons having lathis and dandas in their hands come on 2/3 motorcycles. Just as the Headmaster of the school alighted from the school bus Hoshiyar, the driver of the Alto and the 6/7 persons started beating the Headmaster with their lathis and dandas. When he (Harish) tried to rescue the Headmaster then Hoshiyar Singh gave one lathi blow on his left hand. The other persons also started beating him with lathis and dandas. On noise being raised the PTI, the driver of the school bus and other boys of the team got down from the bus and rescued them. The accused left threatening that today they had escaped but would be killed in the future. Due to the injuries th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top