JUDGMENT

Inderjit Singh. J. - Petitioner Minoti Dhawan has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against respondent Shoraya Talwar, for quashing of order dated 22.03.2017 passed by learned JMIC, Jalandhar, whereby, the application filed by the respondent under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 311 Cr.P.C. was allowed.

2. Notice of motion was issued. Learned counsel for the respondent appeared and contested the petition.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

4. The perusal of the record shows that an application was moved by complainant-respondent under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 311 Cr.P.C. It is stated therein that earlier application moved by the complainant was disposed with the direction that adverse inference would be taken against the accused if she failed to produce the documents sought by complainant. In the revision petition filed by the accused, aforementioned order of the trial Court was set aside. In the application in question, a request has been made for summoning record from the bank as mentioned in the application to prove that being a proprietor