JUDGMENT

H.S. Madaan, J. (Oral) - This revision petition is directed against order dated 24.05.2019, passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Moga, vide which an application under Order 22 Rule 29 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the revisionist was dismissed.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that Rajiv Sabharwal had filed a civil suit against defendant Rajinder Singh, craving for grant of possession as owner by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 07.10.2014 along with consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the land in question in any form. In the alternative, he had sought recovery of Rs.17 lacs i.e. Rs.10 lacs on account of refund of earnest money and Rs.7 lacs on account of damages. That civil suit was decreed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Moga, vide judgment dated 21.04.2018 and a decree of possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 07.10.2014 in respect of the house measuring 5 marlas i.e. 1/2 share of land measuring 10 marlas, situated in Moga Mehla Singh-I, District Moga along with a decree for permanent injunction was passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant. As it comes