SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2798

FATEH DEEP SINGH
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ripu Daman, AAG, Haryana, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) - In this first anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C filed before this Court in case FIR No. 513 dated 24.06.2019 under Sections 376 and 506 IPC registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Karnal, Haryana petitioner-Sunil Kumar has been accused by a married lady working as a maid servant in his house, whereby, she alleges that the accused often used to threaten her that he has her obscene video and often blackmailed her. The complainant has shown apprehension that if anything wrong happens to the family of the complainant, the accused would be responsible for it leading to registration of the present case.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that it was a pure simplicitor dispute over money by the complainant and has sought to place reliance on the documents P-2 and P-4. It is argued that there is no medical evidence to support the case against the petitioner and it is a pure counterblast to resist the petitioner from laying claim over his money.

3. Mr. Ripu Daman, AAG, Haryana on instructions from ASI Parveen Kumar has strongly opposed the grant of the bail on the grounds that the petitioner had been r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top