SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2787

RAVI RANJAN
Rajkur & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Satpal & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Tarun Dhingra, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ram Avtar, Advocate, for the Respondent No.3

JUDGMENT

Ravi Ranjan, J. (Oral) - I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

This appeal has been filed for enhancement of the awarded amount by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Jind, pursuant to the claim application filed under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The son of the applicants Kuldeep Singh alongwith one Krishan Kumar was returning from Narwana to their village Kharal on 05.08.2013 on a motor cycle bearing Registration No.HR-32-F-1753 which was being driven by the deceased at a normal speed and observing the traffic rules. Krishan Kumar was the pillion rider. At about 9.00 p.m. a truck bearing Registration No.PB-13-S-9785 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'offending truck') being driven by respondent no.1 came from the opposite side and struck against the motorcycle. As a result of the accident both the occupants of the motorcycle received multiple serious and grievous injuries. The driver of the offending truck fled away from the spot alongwith the vehicle. The injured Kuldip Singh was taken to General Hospital, Narwana. Thereafter, he was got admitted in Sarvodya Hospital, Hisar, where he succumbed to the injuries on 08.08.2003.

It is claimed that accident

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top