IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Gulab Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 10279 of 2019
Decided On : 18-04-2019
Parole - Last Rites - Section 302, 148, 323, 324, 506, 149 of IPC - Section 304-II IPC - Haryana Good Conduct Prisoner (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007 - Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 - Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a convict under various sections of the IPC, sought parole to perform the last rites of his brother. The jail authorities declined the application citing the minimum one-year imprisonment requirement under the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoner (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007.
Finding of the Court:
The court found merit in the petitioner's plea, citing a previous judgment that held the rules cannot override the provisions of the Act and parole can only be denied on grounds specified in the Act.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner could be granted parole for performing the last rites of his brother despite not meeting the minimum imprisonment requirement under the rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the rules providing a minimum one-year imprisonment requirement were not in consonance with the Act and were very harsh in cases where a convict applies for emergency parole due to a death in the family or similar circumstances.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to release the petitioner on parole to perform the last rites of his brother.
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral) - Prayer in this petition is for grant of three weeks' parole to the petitioner to enable him to perform the last rites/rituals/Terahvi ceremony of his real brother, who had died on 14.04.2019.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a convict in FIR No. 334 dated 30.07.2001, under Sections 302, 148, 323, 324, 506 and 149 of the IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC by the trial Court. However, in criminal appeal bearing CRA-D-348-DB-2003, the sentence awarded to the petitioner was reduced to 10 years by holding him guilty of offence punishable under Section 304-II IPC.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has applied for parole for the purpose of attending/performing the last rites of his real brother who had died on 14.04.2019 and Terahvi ceremony is fixed for 22.04.2019, however, the application of the petitioner was declined.
Reply, by way of affidavit of Superintendent Jail, District Jail, Kaithal, is filed in Court today. Para 8 of the reply reads as under:
"It is also mentioned here that the petitioner/convict has not completed his one year of sentence and not earned his 1st AGCR. So, he is not entitled for parole as per section 4(1) of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoner (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007 which is reproduced as under: "A Prisoner shall be entitled to apply for parole only after he has completed one year of his imprisonment after conviction and has earned his first annual good conduct remission under the Act" and in this case, the petitioner/convict has neither completed his one year of imprisonment after conviction nor earned his first annual good conduct remission, hence not entitled for parole as per above said Parole Act. The copy of the Section 4(1) of the notification dated 18.12.2007 is annexed as Annexure R-2."
4. However, in the report, submitted by the Inspector/SHO, Police Station Titram, District Kaithal, it is stated that the brother of the petitioner, namely Satish son Inder Singh, has died on 14.04.2019 and as per the report given by the present Sarpanch of the village Deoban, no person in the village has any objection if the petitioner is granted parole to attend/perform the last rites of his brother.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon Mahavir vs. State of Haryana and others, 2012 (4) RCR (Crl.) 230. The operative part of the order reads as under:
"The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that the respondents be directed to grant emergency parole to the petitioner to enable him to attend the marriage ceremony of his daughter namely Anju, under Section 3(1)(d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). It is averred that in case FIR No.64 dated 15.05.1999, under Sections 363/366/376/506 IPC, registered at P.S. Hassanpur, the petitioner was convicted vide order dated 05.05.2001 by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Faridabad and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-. It is stated that wedding of daughter of the petitioner namely Anju is scheduled to be held on 25.04.2012. In support thereof, the petitioner has annexed a wedding card (Annexure P2) with the writ petition. Notice of this writ petition was issued and the State has filed reply thereto, by way of affidavit of Kulbir Singh, Superintendent, District Jail, Faridabad. It is stated therein that since the petitioner has not completed one year of his imprisonment, he cannot be granted parole. The State has relied upon Rule 4(1) of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") and it reads as under:- "Rule 4(1) - A prisoner shall be entitled to apply for parole only after he has completed one year of his imprisonment after the conviction and has earned his first annual good conduct remission under the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.