SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2782

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Ramesh (since Deceased) Through His Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Jagbir & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Tuteja, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral) - Prayer in this petition is for setting-aside the order dated 10.12.2015 (Annexure P2) passed by the trial Court vide which the complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 166, 167 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') was dismissed as well as the order dated 29.04.2016 (Annexure P1) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, vide which the revision filed by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a complaint before the trial Court under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., 1973 which was sent to the police for investigation and taking further action. Thereafter, the police registered an FIR No.448 dated 10.06.2009 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 166, 167, 120-B IPC at Police Station City Rohtak, and after completing the investigation, the police submitted a cancellation report. On notice, the petitioner filed a protest petition and in the protest petition, it is submitted that the petitioner/complainant is the adopted son of one Randhir Singh, who died in the year 1980. Randhir Singh has 02 wives namely Smt. Kitabo and Smt. Piari @ Ram Piari. Randh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top