SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2781

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Satbir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan. J. - Prayer in this revision petition is for setting-aside the judgment of conviction dated 03.11.2006 as well as the order of sentence dated 04.11.2006 vide which the petitioner was convicted for offence punishable under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 06 months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month as well as the judgment dated 22.07.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat, vide which the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 20.11.1977, K.K. Bhutani, Government Food Inspector along with Dr. A.K. Rathee and Suresh Kumar visited the shop of the accused at Fountain Chowk, Gohana and found him in possession of about 02 Kgs of Khoya contained in an iron Thai for public sale. A notice on the prescribed Form Ex.PA was served upon the accused demanding sample of Khoya. Accordingly, 600 gms Khoya was purchased from the accused against the payment of Rs.33/-, which was divided into three equal parts and bottled in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top