Satnam Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2615

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Isha Goyal, T.C. Bansal, Advocate, G.S. Sidhu, Advocate, For the Appellant; S.P.S. Tinna, Addl. A.G., Advocate, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sharma, J. - Since common questions of law and facts are involved in CRA-D-728-DB of 2010, CRA-D-848-DB of 2010, CRA-D-878-DB of 2010 and CRA-D-694-DB of 2011, therefore, these are taken up together and being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. These appeals are instituted against judgment and order dated 31.05.2010, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, in Sessions Trial No. 92 of 2010. Appellants Satnam Singh, Mangal Ram alias Mangali and Shingara Singh alias Shingari were charged with and tried for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 302 read with Section 34 IPC, 382 IPC, 27 and 25 of the Arms Act. They were convicted and sentenced as under:-

Name of appellant	Sentenced to RI	Under Section	Fine of Rs.	In default of payment of fine
Shingara Singh alias Shingari	Life Imprisonment	302 IPC	10,000/-	One year
	Five years	382 IPC	5,000/-	One year
	Three years	25 Arms Act	2,000/-	Three months
	Three years	27 Arms Act	2,000/-	Three months
Mangal Ram alias Mangali	Life Imprisonment	302 IPC	10,000/-	One year
	Five years	382 IPC	5,000/-	One year
Satnam singh	Life Imprisonment Five years	302/34 IPC 382 IPC	10,000/- 5,000/-	One year One year

All the substantive sentences of imprisonment were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2615

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHUSatnam Singh – AppellantVersusState Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondent