SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2577

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rajan Gupta, Manjari Nehru Kaul, JJ.
Darshana Kaur - Appellant
Versus
Labh Singh - Respondent
FAO-M-317-2015
Decided On : 11-07-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Tushant Deep Garg, Advocate, for the appellant(s).; Mr. F.S. Virk, Advocate, for the respondent(s).

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the behavior amounting to cruelty and desertion can lead to the dissolution of marriage under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Headnote:

Hindu Marriage Act - Cruelty - Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - [Section 13] - The court discussed the provisions of Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which allows for divorce on grounds of cruelty. The court analyzed the evidence and found that the appellant-wife's behavior amounted to cruelty and desertion, leading to the dissolution of the marriage.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant-wife appealed against the decree of divorce granted to the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The respondent-husband alleged cruel behavior and desertion by the appellant-wife, while she denied the allegations.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant-wife's behavior amounted to cruelty and desertion, and upheld the decree of divorce granted to the respondent-husband.

Issues: The issues included whether the respondent treated the petitioner with cruelty, whether the respondent deserted the petitioner without reasonable grounds, and the maintainability of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the appellant-wife's behavior constituted cruelty and desertion, based on the evidence presented and the lack of conjugal relations for almost 13 years.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the court directed the respondent-husband to pay Rs. 2.5 lakh as permanent alimony to the appellant-wife.

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. - The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-wife against the impugned judgment and decree dated 21.04.2015, passed by the Ld. Addl. District Judge, Patiala (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ld. Court below'), whereby, the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was allowed and her marriage with the respondent-husband/Labh Singh was ordered to be dissolved by way of decree of divorce with immediate effect.

2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of the case, as narrated in the petition filed by the respondent-husband before the Ld. Court below, may be noticed. Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 19th February, 1999, at Village Banga, Distt. Sangrur as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. It was stated to be a simple marriage in which no dowry articles were given by the parents of the appellant-wife except for certain articles which could be used in the kitchen. After the marriage, the parties lived together and cohabited as husband & wife. Two children were born out of their wedlock, who are residing with the respondent-husband. It was averred in the petition that the appellant-wife, right from the date of their marriage indulged in cruel behaviour to the extent of using abusive and foul language, not only against him but also his family. The respondent-husband silently tolerated her rude behaviour hoping that the same would change with time, but her behaviour did not improve even after the birth of their children. Many a times, the appellant-wife threatened the respondent-husband and his family of implicating them in criminal cases. The respondent-husband sought the intervention of the appellant-wife's parents and family, but in vain. It was averred in the petition that the appellant-wife severed all her conjugal relations with the respondent-husband in the year 2005 and in the month of April, 2006, she left the company of the respondent-husband without any sufficient cause, leaving behind her children with him. While going away from the matrimonial house in the year 2006, she took along all her personal belongings including the gold jewellery and clothes. Ever since then, she had been residing at her parental house. After the appellant-wife left the company of the respondent-husband, he made efforts with the help of respectables and Panchayat Members to bring the appellant-wife back to the matrimonial home, but the same proved to be unsuccessful.

3. On the contrary, in the written statement filed by the appellant-wife (respondent therein), she refuted and denied the averments made in the petition by the respondent-husband. She, rather, pleaded that her children had been forcibly retained by the appellant-husband, who was a drunkard and addicted to intoxicants. He would mercilessly beat her up and would not even spare their children. She denied severing conjugal relations with the respondent-husband since the year 2005 as well as leaving the company of the respondent-husband without any sufficient cause in the month of April, 2006.

4. On such pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed by the Ld. Court below:-

"1. Whether the respondent has treated the petitioner with cruelty Rs. OPP

2. Whether the respondent has deserted the petitioner since April 2006 without any reasonable ground Rs. OPP

3. Whether the petition is not maintainable Rs. OPR

4. Whether the petitioner has no cause of action to file the present petition Rs. OPT

5. Relief"

5. In order to prove his case, the respondent-husband himself stepped into the witness-box as PW-1 and examined his neighbour - Lakhwinder Singh as PW-2. On the other hand, the appellant-wife stepped into the witness-box as RW-1 and examined her father - Banarsi Dass as RW-2. She closed her evidence by tendering copy of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. as Ex.RWl/A and copy of the complaint under Sections 406, 498-A and 506 IPC as Ex.RWl/B. Ld. C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top