SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2577

RAJAN GUPTA, MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Darshana Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Labh Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Tushant Deep Garg, Advocate, for the appellant(s).; Mr. F.S. Virk, Advocate, for the respondent(s).

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. - The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-wife against the impugned judgment and decree dated 21.04.2015, passed by the Ld. Addl. District Judge, Patiala (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ld. Court below'), whereby, the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was allowed and her marriage with the respondent-husband/Labh Singh was ordered to be dissolved by way of decree of divorce with immediate effect.

2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of the case, as narrated in the petition filed by the respondent-husband before the Ld. Court below, may be noticed. Marriage between the parties was solemnized on 19th February, 1999, at Village Banga, Distt. Sangrur as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. It was stated to be a simple marriage in which no dowry articles were given by the parents of the appellant-wife except for certain articles which could be used in the kitchen. After the marriage, the parties lived together and cohabited as husband & wife. Two children were born out of their wedlock, who are residing with the respondent-husband. It was averred in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top