SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2658

AMIT RAWAL
Joginder Singh And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Bhagat Singh And Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Umesh Aggarwal, for the Appellant; P.S. Jammu, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J. - CM No. 5940-C of 2019

1. The application for impleading the legal representatives of deceased-respondent No. 1 is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the legal representatives are ordered to be brought on record for the purpose of adjudication of present appeal.

The amended memo of parties is taken on record and the registry is directed to put the same at appropriate place.

RSA No. 2312 of 1988

The present regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate Court whereby plaintiffs suit dismissed by the trial Court has been partly allowed and decree for possession of 1/6th share in the land in dispute has been passed.

2. The case revolves around succession of shop of one Dalipa Plaintiff is nephew from the maternal side of Dalipa i.e., sons of sister of Dalipa whereas defendants are nephews i.e. sons of Dalipa's brother. Plaintiff propounded the registered Will dated 20.04.1981 alleged to have been attested by PW 4 Rajinder Mehta, Municipal Commissioner, Sunder Nagar and J.C. Khanna, PW 5 whereas defendants also propounded registered Will dated 08.09.1977.

3. Both the parties led extensive evidence.

4. Mr. Umesh Aggarwal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top