SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2678

HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
Satya Parkash And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Puran And Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the Appellant; Raina Sabharwal Thakur, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harminder Singh Madaan, J. - Briefly stated, facts of the case are that plaintiff Sh. Mool Chand son of Sh. Nathu Ram son of Sh. Devdutt, resident of village Sulkha, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari had brought a suit against defendants i.e. S/Sh.Puran and Tara sons of Som Parkash, Smt. Kunta Devi widow of Rangi Lal, Smt. Yashwanti Devi - widow and Sh. Satish Kumar son of Sh. Jawahar and Ram Payari widow of Kishan, all residents of the same village, craving for grant of a decree for permanent injunction submitting that he is owner in possession of the suit land comprised in Khewat No. 188, Khatoni No. 247, rectangle No. 55, killa No. 14/1(3-13), khasra Nos. 406(0-2), 407(0-2), 408(0-2) measuring 3 kanals 19 marlas situated at village Sulkha, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari since long; that the defendants wanted to take forcible possession of the suit land from the plaintiff on the strength of the entries in their favour managed by them in the revenue record, not listening to his request to desist from doing so. According to the plaintiff, the defendants never remained in possession of any part of the suit land for the last 12 years before institution of the suit whereas the poss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top