2019 Supreme(P&H) 3003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Bikramjit Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M-19259-2019 (O&M)
Decided On : 30-10-2019
Mr. P.S. Hundal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jagtar Singh, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. H.S. Grewal, Addl. AG, Punjab. for the Respondent; Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate and Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Advocate for the complainant
The main legal point established in the judgment is the jurisdiction of the Illaqa Magistrate to extend the investigation period and the petitioner's entitlement to default bail after the challan was filed.
Headnote:
Bail - Provisions of Section 167 (2)(a)(i)(ii) of Cr.P.C. - Sections 302, 307, 452, 341, 427, 34 IPC, Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, Sections 3, 4, 5 & 6 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 13, 16, 18 & 18B of UAP Act - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought bail under Section 167 (2)(a)(i)(ii) of Cr.P.C. during the pendency of trial in a case involving serious injuries and deaths due to a grenade explosion. The Illaqa Magistrate extended the investigation period to 180 days, which was later set aside by the revisional Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Illaqa Magistrate had jurisdiction to extend the investigation period to 180 days. The petitioner's claim for default bail was dismissed as the challan was presented before the Special Court. The Court also held that the petitioner's right to seek default bail did not survive after the challan was filed.
Issues: The issues revolved around the jurisdiction of the Illaqa Magistrate to extend the investigation period, the petitioner's entitlement to default bail, and the requirement of sanction under the UAP Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Illaqa Magistrate had the jurisdiction to extend the investigation period to 180 days. The petitioner's right to seek default bail did not survive after the challan was filed. The Court also ruled that no sanction was required to prosecute the petitioner for certain offences.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, affirming the Illaqa Magistrate's jurisdiction to extend the investigation period and rejecting the petitioner's claim for default bail.
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral) - Prayer in this petition is for releasing the petitioner on bail as per provisions of Section 167 (2)(a)(i)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C.'), during pendency of the trial, in FIR No.121 dated 18.11.2018 under Sections 302, 307, 452, 341, 427, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'), Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, Sections 3, 4, 5 & 6 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 13, 16, 18 & 18B of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (for short 'UAP Act'), registered at Police Station Rajasansi, District Amritsar.
2. Brief facts of the prosecution version, as per the FIR registered on the statement of one Arjan Singh, are that on 18.11.2018, he was present in Nirankari Bhawan, where a Satsang was going on and about 200 persons were present. The complainant was doing the duty of Security Guard on the main gate, when two young boys came on a motorcycle. One boy took out a pistol and told the complainant to stand near the washroom. The second boy went inside and threw a grenade in the Satsang Hall and thereafter, both of them ran away. Due to grenade explosion, 22 persons were seriously injured and later on, three persons died and others suffered multiple grievous injuries.
3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner along with one co-accused Avtar was later on arrested on 21.11.2018 and he was produced before the Illaqa Magistrate for the purpose of extension of his judicial remand on 22.11.2018 and therefore, a period of 90 days was to expire on 19.02.2019. It is further submitted that in the meantime, on an application moved by the Public Prosecutor on 12.02.2019, seeking extension of time for presentation of challan, the Illaqa Magistrate, on 13.02.2019, passed the following orders: -
"Keeping in view the facts mentioned in the present application sensitivity of the matter and recovery made so far, I am of the considered view that thorough investigation is required in the present case and thus application stands allowed and period of investigation is extended to 180 days."
4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner further submits that the aforesaid order was challenged by the petitioner and co-accused Avtar before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge by way of filing a criminal revision petition and this order was set aside by the revisional Court on a technical ground that the Illaqa Magistrate has no jurisdiction to entertain the application for extension of period of investigation, as per notification of the Govt. of Punjab dated 10.06.2014, which reads as under: -
"In exercise of power conferred under sub section (1) of section 22 of National Investigation Agency, 2008 (Central Act No.34 of 2008), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab, with the concurrence of Hon'ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh is pleased to constitute the Courts of Sessions Judge and the First Additional Sessions Judge (for the area falling within their respective jurisdiction), at each district headquarter in the State, to be the "Special Courts" for the trial of offences as specified in the Schedule appended to the aforesaid Act, which was investigated by the state police."
5. The revisional Court held that since the trial in the present FIR is to be conducted by a Special Court, the Illaqa Magistrate has no jurisdiction to extend the period under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. It is a matter of record that neither the State nor the complainant challenged this order dated 13.02.2019, vide which the Illaqa Magistrate extended the period beyond 90 days i.e. upto 180 days, to submit the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. In the meantime, the petitioner filed an application for grant of default bail, which was declined by the Illaqa Magistrate vide order dated 25.02.2019, observing that since the period of presentation of challan/completion of investigation stands extended upto 18