SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2951

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Jaswant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate, for the Appellant; H.S. Sullar, DAG, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. - The petitioner was tried for committing the offences under Sections 283, 337, 338 and 304-A IPC. Vide judgment and order dated 14.10.2011 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Balachaur, SBS Nagar, while acquitting the petitioner of the charges under Section 337 and 338 IPC, found him guilty for the offences under Sections 283 and 304-A IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for one year under Section 304-A IPC and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo imprisonment for one week, whereas under Section 283 IPC, the petitioner was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- only and, in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for one day.

2. Aggrieved there-against, the petitioner filed an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, SBS, Nagar. However, vide judgment dated 17.4.2012, the learned Sessions Judge, dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner, thereby affirming the judgment and order passed by the learned trial Magistrate.

3. Still aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred the present revision petition.

4. As would emerge from the facts of the case, the FIR in this case was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top