SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 3002

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - Leave to appeal has been sought against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rajpura dated 30.10.2017 while deciding criminal complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act of 1881").

2. Criminal prosecution was launched by the appellant alleging that the cheque dated 15.02.2016 issued in discharge of legal liability by the accused for a sum of Rs. 2,90,000/- drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, SSI Branch, Rajpura, has been dishonoured with the remarks "Funds Insufficient" and in spite of notice demanding the amount, payment has not been made.

3. Learned Judicial Magistrate has found that no doubt holder of cheque has a statutory presumption in terms of Sections 118 and 139 of the Act of 1881, however, there is a doubt in the case set up by the prosecution for following reasons:-

1). Complainant-victim is a Property Dealer by profession. He claimed that he is also having rental income but account books have not been produced. Complainant also admits that he was a Municipal Councilor and now his wife is a Municipal Councilor whereas accused is worke

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top