ANIL KSHETARPAL
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - Leave to appeal has been sought against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rajpura dated 30.10.2017 while deciding criminal complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act of 1881").
2. Criminal prosecution was launched by the appellant alleging that the cheque dated 15.02.2016 issued in discharge of legal liability by the accused for a sum of Rs. 2,90,000/- drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, SSI Branch, Rajpura, has been dishonoured with the remarks "Funds Insufficient" and in spite of notice demanding the amount, payment has not been made.
3. Learned Judicial Magistrate has found that no doubt holder of cheque has a statutory presumption in terms of Sections 118 and 139 of the Act of 1881, however, there is a doubt in the case set up by the prosecution for following reasons:-
1). Complainant-victim is a Property Dealer by profession. He claimed that he is also having rental income but account books have not been produced. Complainant also admits that he was a Municipal Councilor and now his wife is a Municipal Councilor whereas accused is worke
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.