JUDGMENT

Lisa Gill, J. - Petitioner, is aggrieved of order dated 22.02.2017, passed by the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh as well as order dated 06.07.2018, passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Chandigarh whereby eviction petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the case are that the petitioner, filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, (for short 'Act'), seeking ejectment of the respondent from the premises as detailed therein. Petitioner, claimed to be the owner of the property in question, while pleading that the house in question was allotted by the Chandigarh Housing Board to Sh. Nathu Ram, her father-in-law. Nathu Ram, died on 25.05.1998. Petitioner's husband, Rishi Pal son of Nathu Ram, it is pleaded, succeeded to the property. However, Rishi Pal, unfortunately fell ill and ultimately died on 31.05.2004 at Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector -32, Chandigarh. As the petitioner required money for the treatment of her husband, she came in contact with the respondent in the year 2004, itself, who offered Rs. 1.10 lakh as a friendly loan. It is further pleaded