SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2865

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Amit – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. (Oral) - Present petition has been filed against order dated 08.11.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palwal whereby the application filed by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle Tractor on Superdari has been rejected.

2. The brief facts of the case which can been seen from the file would be that vide Annexure P-l, the vehicle belonging to the petitioner was seized under Sub-rule 104 of The Haryana Minor Mineral Concession, Stocking, Transportation of Minerals and Prevention of Illegal Mining Rules, 2012 (hereinafter, referred to as 'the Rules'). Learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter, moved an application before the learned Illaqa Magistrate, Palwal (Annexure P-5) for releasing the vehicle Tractor on Superdari to the petitioner who is stated to be the owner of the vehicle. Learned Illaqa Magistrate, Palwal vide impugned order has dismissed the application on the ground that as per Rule 104 of the Rules; the consequences of illegal or un-authorised mining have been specifically provided the provisions of Rules 104 which is reproduced as under:-

"104. Consequences of illegal or unauthorised miningAny act of illegal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top