SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2873

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Shokatali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana & Anr. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana. None for respondent No.2

JUDGMENT

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. (Oral) - CRM-39952-2019

In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and copies of proclamation notice, reply of serving official, statement of serving official and order of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kalka are taken on record as Annexures P-8, P-9, P-10 and P-11, respectively, subject to all just exceptions.

CRM-M-64796-2018

1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR No. 199 dated 23.7.2018 registered at Police Station Pinjore City, District Panchkula under Section 174-A of Indian Penal Code on the ground that the matter hassince been compromised amongst the parties as well as for setting aside of order dated 4.7.2018 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kalka (Annexure P-2) vide which the petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender.

2. A few facts necessary to notice for disposal of this petition are that respondent No.2 had instituted a complaint under Sections 323, 406, 420, 452, 498-A, 506 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, wherein the petitioner was summoned to face trial as an accused. However, on account of non-appearance of the petitioner, proceedings under Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top