SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2832

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pritpal Singh & Anr. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Anantdeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Challenge is made to the order dated 30.10.2019 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) Moga, vide which the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filed by the respondent for amendment of the written statement was allowed.

2. Plaintiff filed a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 25.05.2017 and in the alternative suit for recovery of Rs.23,55,000/- inclusive of penalty along with interest, with consequential relief of permanent injunction was also filed.

3. In the aforesaid suit, defendants filed an application for amendment in the written statement on the ground that that suit filed by the plaintiff is based on the agreement to sell allegedly executed by the defendants which they have denied by questioning the execution and validity of the agreement to sell dated 25.05.2017. The defendants sought amendment in the written statement by proposing to add para No.4a. which is to the following effect:-

"4a. That present suit is result of collusion and concoction of plaintiff, Satnam Singh, M/s Aggarwal foods and its partner Kapil Kumar and Sukhdev Singh. In fact all these persons have made a gang to rob the defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top