JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill , J. - Challenge in the present petition is to the orders passed by the Courts below, whereby the complaint filed by the petitioner under Sections 499/500/120-B IPC, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner argues that while passing the impugned orders, both the Courts below did not take into consideration that specific averments made in the said complaint, which had not only disclosed the offence of defamation against the respondents, but also a criminal conspiracy hatched by them in order to bring a disrepute to the petitioner.

3. I do not, however, find any merit in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. The learned trial Court, while dismissing the complaint filed by the petitioner, on the basis of the evidence led by the complainant in support of the averments made in the complaint, had found that no prima-facie evidence of conspiracy was either alleged or made out and the matter did not fall within the definition of defamation because if an imputation was made on the character of a person in a good faith regarding the protection of the interests of the person making it or any other person or for