RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Paramraj Singh Umranangal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Vide this common order, CRM-M Nos.7350 and 8125 of 2021 are being decided. Since both the cases have arisen from common FIR, therefore, for the sake of brevity common facts are being noticed.
2. In the aforesaid petitions, both the petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.130 dated 21.10.2015 registered under Sections 302, 307, 341, 201, 218, 166-A, 120-B, 34, 194, 195, 109 IPC and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act at Police Station Bajakhana, District Faridkot.
3. Petitioners have been summoned by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridkot for 01.03.2021 on presentation of 3 rd supplementary report under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C., after completion of further investigation by the Special Investigation Team (for short 'the SIT').
4. At the time of incident of sacrilege in District Faridkot i.e. Behbal Kalan/Bargari, the petitioner-Paramraj Singh Umranangal was posted as Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana. Violence took place at two places i.e. Kotkapura and Behbal Kalan. The incident of sacrilege took place in village Bargari. FIR No.128 was registered on 12.10.2015 under Sections 295 and 120-B IPC at Police St
Shiva Nath Prasad vs. State of W.B. and others
Vijay Tyagi vs. Irshad Ali @ Deepak and others
Japani Sahoo vs. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty
King-Emperor vs. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others
Mutha Associates and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others
P. Vijayan vs. State of Kerala and Another
R.P. Singh vs. J.A.C. Saldhana and others
Ravindra Saxena vs State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.