SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 266

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Shamsher Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Varinder Basa, Advocate, B.S. Sewak, Advocate, Yaseen Sethi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudip Ahluwalia, J. - In this petition, the petitioners, who are the accused persons in F.I.R No.079, dated 28.06.2019 under Sections 323, 324, 326 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sadar Batala, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1), have prayed for quashing of F.I.R. with all subsequent proceedings pending therefrom, on the basis of compromise.

2. Now the complainant has arrived at a settlement with the accused persons vide Compromise Deed (Annexure P-2), which is duly signed by him. The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The Ld. Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Batala vide report dated 12.01.2021 has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure.

3. Respondent No.2 is represented by his counsel who does not dispute the factum of compromise.

4. In view of the report of the Ld. Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Batala and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another", (2012) 4 RCR(Cri) 543 and "Narinder Singh and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top