SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 334

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Hardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dilpreet Singh Gandhi, Advocate, B.S. Sewak, Advocate, Vikas Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudip Ahluwalia, J. - In this petition, the petitioners, who are the accused persons in F.I.R No.0117, dated 09.05.2016, under Sections 323, 336, 295, 506, 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sultanwind, District Amritsar (Annexure P-1), have prayed for quashing of F.I.R. with all subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise.

2. With the intervention of respectables and elderly people of the society, the complainants have arrived at a settlement with the accused persons vide Compromise/Affidavits (Annexure P-2), which is duly signed by them. The matter was referred to the Court below for recording of statements of the parties and to report with respect to genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the parties. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amritsar, vide report dated 16.12.2020, has apprised this Court that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and without any pressure.

3. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are represented by their Counsel through Video Conferencing, who does not dispute the compromise.

4. In view of the report of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amritsar, and in view

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top