SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sudip Ahluwalia, J.
Parvesh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No. 41338 of 2020
Decided On : 05-01-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Parveen Sharma, Advocate, Anmol Malik, Advocate

The court considered the petitioner's custody period, the stay on framing charges against other accused persons, and the likelihood of substantial trial delay due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic in granting regular bail.

Headnote:

Regular Bail - Criminal Procedure - The court granted the petitioner regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The court considered the petitioner's custody period, the stay on framing charges against other accused persons, and the likelihood of substantial trial delay due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case involving charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The trial was pending, and the framing of charges against other accused persons had been stayed.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for regular bail, considering the petitioner's custody period, the stay on framing charges against other accused persons, and the likelihood of substantial trial delay due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

Issues: Regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, custody period, stay on framing charges against other accused persons, trial delay due to Covid-19 pandemic

Ratio Decidendi: The court granted the petitioner regular bail based on the custody period, the stay on framing charges against other accused persons, and the likelihood of substantial trial delay due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for regular bail and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail, subject to the same terms and conditions as the co-accused Vikas @ Vicky and Sumit.

JUDGMENT

Sudip Ahluwalia, J. - The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner, seeking regular bail in case FIR No.223 dated 02.06.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 302, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, and subsequently added Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Civil Line, Sonipat, District Sonipat.

2. Seen Letter No.312 dated 21.12.2020 sent up by the Ld. Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sonipat, in whose Court the original trial is pending.

3. On perusal of the same, it transpires that framing of charges against two other accused persons, namely Rohit and Mohit, has been stayed by the Co-ordinate Bench(es) of this Court in connection with the revision petitions filed by those accused persons, on account of which the Ld. Trial Judge is unable to proceed further in the trial, or to record the statement of the injured Sonu, as was directed by this Court on the last date.

4. In this view of the matter, the petitioner, who has remained in custody for a period of three years and seven months, since 05.06.2017, and is also not named in the original FIR, deserves to be treated at par with co-accused Vikas @ Vicky and Sumit, who have already been granted regular bail by this Court in CRM-M-39405-2020 and CRM-M-36805-2020, respectively.

5. The petitioner is, therefore, also at this stage is liable to be released on regular bail pending trial, on the identical terms and conditions, as were imposed in the case of co-accused Vikas @ Vicky and Sumit.

6. As such, without commenting any further on the merits of the present case as a whole and in view of the detention undergone by the petitioner, as also the fact that the trial is likely to take its own substantial time, particularly on account of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the prayer of the petitioner for regular bail is allowed and he is ordered to be released on bail, subject to imposition of the same terms and conditions like co-accused Vikas @ Vicky and Sumit, to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

7. Disposed off.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top