JUDGMENT :

ARCHANA PURI, J.

1. Challenge in the present appeal, is to the judgment of conviction dated 25.07.2014 and order of sentence of even date passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Sangrur, vide which appellant Satish Kumar was held guilty and convicted under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 363 IPC. For the commission of offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of fourteen years and fine of Rs. 25,000/- was also imposed, in default whereof, he was to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. Likewise, for commission of offence under Section 363 IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- was imposed, in default whereof, he was further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months.

2. Background facts in nutshell are as follows:-

That, as per prosecution version, the complainant had two sons. The elder son is 12½ years and the victim child (name withheld) is about 11 years. On 13.10.2013, the complainant along with his sons and wife had gone to C