SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 158

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Parmod – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. K.S. Malik-I, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, DAGA Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

2. This petition is for grant of regular bail in case of FIR No. 403 dated 5.9.2020, under Sections 354-A, 506, 376, 511 IPC and 10 of POCSO Act, 2012 registered at Police Station Meham, District Rohtak.

3. The FIR was at the best of Suman. The allegations are that on the night intervening 4/5.9.2020, at about 1:00 a.m. when she woke up, her daughter 'A' (name withheld) was not on her cot. While searching for her, they heard noise from the house of neighbourer. She along with her husband entered the house and saw Parmod (petitioner) had pressed the mouth of her daughter and seeing them, he ran away. When asked, the prosecutrix told that the petitioner was molesting her for the last 15 days in the house of Hawa Singh. He used to come through roof. He threatened that he will kill the family of the prosecutrix.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication due to old enmity. There are contradiction in the FIR and statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. There is no medical evidence except for statement.

5. Learned State counsel o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top