AVNEESH JHINGAN
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.
1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.
2. This petition is filed for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.114 dated 27.02.2019 registered under Sections 354, 363, 366-A, 376 IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 at Police Station Samalkha, District Panipat, Haryana.
3. The FIR was registered at the instance of father of the prosecutrixes (names withheld), who were 16 and 13 years of age and went missing on 26.02.2019. It was stated that Sandeep (petitioner) had abducted daughters of complainant with the intention to marry the elder one. After registering the FIR, the girls were recovered by the family members of the parties from Meerut. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2019. There are contradictions in the statements. The prosecutrix, who was 16 years of age, was a consenting party. The contention is that the conclusion of trial is likely to take time and the DNA report is still awaited.
4. Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for bail by submitting that the prosecutrixes are yet to be examined. The consent of minor victim will not be mat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.