AVNEESH JHINGAN
Mahesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.
1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.
2. This is a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 114, dated 24th November, 2019 under Sections 323/34/354-A/377/406/498-A/506 of IPC, registered at Women Police Station, Manesar, District Gurugram on the basis of compromise.
3. Vide order dated 19th November, 2020, the parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded. On 9th February, 2021, learned counsel for the parties sought one more opportunity to appear before the trial Court. As no explanation was coming forth for not appearing before the trial Court, cost of Rs. 25,000/- was imposed.
4. The report dated 13th January, 2021 of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram is received, stating that compromise is voluntary and without any coercion. It is further stated that petitioners have not been declared proclaimed offenders.
5. The present litigation is outcome of matrimonial dispute. The parties, with the intervention of respectables of the family have decided to part ways and proceed further in their lives.
6. The Supreme
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and Others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.